Friday post: LGF this Thursday with Will Norman, and much more
For those of you who are not subscribed to
LCC's Friday post, I'm forwarding details of tonight's Local Group
Forum with Will Norman. There will also be introductions to the
new LCC staff so it should be worth attending, see below.
Regards John Chamberlain
-------- Forwarded Message --------
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Elena Moynihan
Thank you for sending this link, for those of us who were not able to attend would it be possible to circulate any minutes/actions from the meeting ? Whilst it is encouraging to hear about cycling infrastructure spending, historically this meant pointless painting on streets which serve no purpose and are routinely ignored: how can we ensure we push TfL to spend this money on segregated structures ?
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 13:44, John Chamberlain <john@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
As far as I know, LCC don't take minutes or record the Local Group
Forum meetings.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Regarding painted lanes etc, almost all recent cycle infrastructure on busy roads consists of segregated lanes, installed either by TfL (on their roads) or local councils. And LTNs create quiet neighbourhoods where specific infrastructure is not needed. Camden has been very active and there is a good summary of what they have been doing on our website here with specific reference to segregated routes here Other boroughs, notoriously Kensington & Chelsea and Westminster, have failed to provide for cycling or have used painted lanes. K&C have even removed the segregated lane they put in with TfL funding. TfL will not fund sub-standard facilities and are looking to claw back the money that councils took if they then remove the facility. So pressure really needs to be on the boroughs, rather than TfL. There's a really good graphic showing the growth of segregated lanes in London but I can't put my finger on it - anyone?
Regards John Chamberlain
On 18/06/21 15:14, EleNdubz wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Steven Edwards
The main suggestions from the meeting were to keep responding the mass of consultations on
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
ETO measures (many soon to reach the end of their temporary trial period). There has indeed been an amazing amount of infra that’s gone in in the last year and a bit; the equivalent to perhaps several year’s worth under ’normal’ circumstances. A problem for TfL has been ‘burn-out’ - with insufficient officers available to keep up with the pace of change (facing off the noise of the opposition who remain persistent despite the positive ruling on the Bishopsgate measures). The successful overturning of this JR (challenge by the pro-motoring lobby to the City measures), though positive (and will likely be cited in further instances where motoring groups challenge active/healthy travel schemes), tereare still other JRs still to go to the courts. The other main take-away from the meeting was to ensure your councillors receive positive feedback for the schemes that have gone in. I referred to one of my preferred routes (from a wide choice across Camden), of Waterloo to Camden via Gower Street, made possible by the simple contra-flow on Endell Street (in Covent Garden). Steven
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
richendawalford
John – do you mean this? Timelapse – cycle infrastructure: https://safecycleldn.com/2021/06/08/london-cycle-infrastructure-through-time-2/
Richenda Walford
From: main@camdencyclists.groups.io <main@camdencyclists.groups.io>
On Behalf Of John Chamberlain via groups.io
As far as I know, LCC don't take minutes or record the Local Group Forum meetings.
Regards John Chamberlain
On 18/06/21 15:14, EleNdubz wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
That's the one - thanks Richenda!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Regards John
On 19/06/21 12:26, richendawalford
wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|