From Mick Farrant,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
22, Elaine Grove
I am now compelled to use the Royal College Track to get to work at Kings
Cross because of the appaling state of the road between the two stations (St
Pancras Way). This is extremely dangerous to cyclists.
There is absolutely no need for the Gabriel's lorries to use the cycle track
for delivering pallets of paving stones as showed in Lionel's pictures. All
they need to do is unload onto small trolleys and wheel them onto the sites.
The unloading is causing damage to the track as the stilts (bracing posts)
from the lorries make indents. It is normal practice for such lorries to put
wooden blocks under the stilts.
I assume that it is Camden Council who are the main contractors. The
officers concerned should ensure that the blockages and damage do not occur.
When roads are closed the Council has to seek an order and publicise this.
Does not this have to be the case for a cycle lane ?
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrea Casalotti <andrea@...>
To: Harrison, Gerry <gerry.harrison@...>;
Cc: Taylor, Norman <Norman.Taylor@...>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 3:54 PM
Subject: [CCC] RE: Contractors Render Royal College Street Cycle Track
Thank you for providing some entertainment, Gerry.
This is just the self-serving, self-interested sort of comment that one
expects from the lunatic fringe of the Camden Cycling Campaign, which
the past three or four years has worked constructively with the Council.Self-interested? I hardly ever cycle there. (Disclosure: it is my
regular route). I am concerned for those people who, attracted by the new
cycle lane, now have to cycle against the flow of a fast one-way street.
Some members of the CCC, such as Mr Casalotti may not have heard ofGerry, you know very well that I am familiar with the Boulevard scheme.
Boulevard, which frankly will benefit very many more people than a cycle
It so happens that, rightly or wrongly,That is exactly what we are trying to determine. Who has given them the
right temporarily to close a cycle lane?
Gabriels have blocked the
Seven Stations Route from time to time in order to carry out
works. Lionel's photographs provided some evidence. Officers are
of this and have been speaking to Gabriels, who is a contractorIt doesn't seem that these conversation are very fruitful.
But really there is something serious amiss here. If Gabriel need to close
the cycle lane (and judging from the photographs, it seems that they do
the space) than one of the road lanes needs to be converted to temporary
I am quite sure that if Gabriels had been able to do itIf this is the case, then the Council is clearly and seriously at fault
another way they would have done.
not providing a temporary cycle lane (which incidentally does not mean
around the block: there is plenty of road space right next to the cycle
I don't understand how you got this idea that I am not in favour of
Mr Casalotti should remember that he is one of a tiny minority of Camden
residents, the majority of whom support the aims of Boulevard,
Boulevard. As everyone knows I strongly believe that pedestrians' needs
should come before cyclists' needs
and if it was
not for the Council that he wishes now to take to court there would be
cycle route, segregated or otherwise in Royal College Street.My comments clearly implied that I presumed it is the contractors who were
acting improperly. Your statement is almost an admission that it is the
Council who has a case to answer.
Goodwill isIt seems that the silly season is all year round in Camden:
rather important. Dear oh dear. It must be the silly season, Paul.
From squandering tax-payers money awarding courier work to higher-bidder
Parcelfarce to u-turning in Covent Garden, because a couple of street
closures inconvenience some taxi drivers.
Maybe the CCC can consider the selfishness of his attitude at it
Hey, I am talking about sharing.
It is quite simple: there are three lanes, one of which is a two way cycle
lane. Work needs to be carried out that necessitates the closure of the
cycle lane. Put a few plastic bollards and convert one of the car lanes
cycle lanes. So we all share the available road space. Easy.
Doesn't sound selfish to me.
But maybe I am guilty because I have not been brainwashed by the motor
in believing that the convenience of motorists is more important than the
safety of pedestrians and cyclists.
All the best,
It reminds me of the residents of my ward who live next door to
Heath but who object, each year, to a fairground which is there for one
two weekends in a year.
(one cyclist who is aware of the wider picture)
From: Andrea Casalotti [mailto:andrea@...]
Sent: 13 August 2001 09:08
To: CamdenCyclingCampaign@...; Gerry Harrison
Subject: Contractors Render Royal College Street Cycle Track Unusable
The Royal College Street cycle track has been half obstructed for the
few weeks with construction materials, and on some days
have totally blocked the track, rendering it unusable. The
problem is being
caused by contractors Gabriel, who are undertaking pavement
renewal as part
of Camden's ambitious Boulevard street environment improvement programme
We have complained to the council on a number of occasions, and
disappointed that the council cannot seem to bring about any
Now one of our Committee members has taken a raft of photos which
graphically show the damming evidence - see some of them here:
This is appalling. Doesn't the Council have a statutory duty to
alternatives? Does the contractor have a right to park on the cycle
Have they paid to block our right of way? If not, let's take them
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/